154 Comments
User's avatar
David's avatar

Is it really six years since your podcast with ‘CK’?! I remember it well. Listening to the opening exchanges again, he did at the time come across as a little odd. I remember at some point during the podcast you said something along the lines of ‘you are a little annoying’. I think maybe the fraud was revealing itself through the fakeness of his spiel. I remember agreeing with you. He was very annoying. 💯 Not real, not dead. According to someone else on here (I think maybe Gemma O’Doherty??) Valhalla is also the CIA’s name for their witness protection scheme. Either way, total psyop. Terrifying, if one pauses for a second to comprehend that fact.

Expand full comment
James Delingpole's avatar

I'm going to have to put myself through the ordeal of listening to it again so that I can remind myself which things particularly annoyed me about him. I do remember coming away from the chat feeling ineffably disappointed.

Expand full comment
mrsrosiek's avatar

oh no - I don't envy you - do prepare yourself well for that mentally and physically as it'll be difficult in different ways - as I'm sure you're well aware.

Expand full comment
Dorothee's avatar

"I remember at some point during the podcast you said something along the lines of ‘you are a little annoying’."

The podcast can be freely heard here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YTPHeGqJsak

I've just listened to all 32 minutes of it.

Nowhere does James say anything of the sort.

And he closes by saying, "I do like you Charlie ... I think you're a decent sort, and I'm glad that you've come to save our sorry a*ses, so good luck."

Expand full comment
James Delingpole's avatar

Wow! That is very interesting. Thank you for listening to it. I worry in that case that I was allowing politeness to overcome my inner feelings which - I do remember quite vividly - were: “What a disappointment that was.”

Expand full comment
David's avatar
4dEdited

I tried to listen to it all, but I just couldn't. Very annoying to listen to and frankly strange. CK wasn't new to me then. I'd already been regularly watching his Instagram shorts for at least a year before your podcast. So I already knew him well in terms of his character, his slick delivery and his message. Or so I thought. I was much like you - so grateful that someone of his generation was taking on the Left/Woke and seeming to be making a huge impact with his message. I've listened to only snippets but perhaps the bit that was sticking in my mind was your exchange with him at 31:58: 'I didn't think I'd like you...' I don't know.

His fast-paced rhetoric was so sharp and (seemingly) effective that, in those days, we could only be thankful for such a voice. How things have changed.

Expand full comment
David's avatar
4dEdited

Certainly nowhere near as slick.

Expand full comment
unworried's avatar

He was 25 years old at time of this interview. Any of us oldies recall what we were like at that age?

Expand full comment
MarcusBierce's avatar

That assertion re: Valhalla is from a Hollywood movie, which likely makes it more believable in today’s day and age.

Expand full comment
James's avatar

More trauma based mind control. We can't get the images out of our head - blood spurting from a 'shot' Charlie Kirk, George Floyd gasping to death (supposedly), 9/11 'planes' slicing into a skyscraper. These events imprint on our minds and merge with the messages pumped out by the media. It's brutal but effective.

Expand full comment
Emma's avatar

We need to look less at these images - I agree once seen they do imprint especially with the accompanying music e.g. MOD (Ministry of Defence) propaganda clips shown on UK Column.

Expand full comment
Jane Baker's avatar

Every single time one of these hugely visible and by huge coincidence broadcast live to the whole world events happen - I never see it. Subsequently I see bits but I don't seek them out. By the way that Ukraine blonde girl died very decorously on that bus. I did see that. It scrolled past before I could stop it. Everyone says they saw the blood. I saw NO BLOOD. Are my eyes defective. A black man got up from the seat behind her,he then stood facing the camera for long enough to get his FACE imprinted,his face filled the whole camera like this was a directed movie not a crappy cctv fuzzy image public camera. He then passed his hand across the young woman's throat. We saw the back of his HAND,that's ALL. We saw no knife,and she continued reading her book seemingly totally unconcerned and oblivious. Watch the film again if its still out there. Then she closed the book and looking mildly surprised listed to one side. There WAS NO MARK ON HER THROAT. There was NO BLOOD pumping,gushing,spurting out. Have Americans got so used to bang bang your dead tv deaths they think the dying moments are like that. Why could I not see a drop of blood but replyers to me saw pools of blood. She curled into a ball and slipped under the seat,so neat and tidy. No wonder none of the other passengers was noticing or reacting. They were not being callous. They were not reacting because NOTHING was happening. But thats a long side issue. Every time one of these Great Big Nothngs happens God puts it in my life to be busy with something and either be away from screens etc or to have classical music on in some uninterruptible form like cd or DVD. Maybe one day I'll go outside to find Armageddon has happened while I was sewing patchwork to the accompaniment of Bach.

Expand full comment
Linda Meads's avatar

Yes and yes. Like you, I try to do more of the latter. It’s become a toggle between remaining alert to recognise the next threat, warning the ‘gang’ and maintaining peace of mind in order to slough off “the thousand natural shocks that flesh is heir to".

Expand full comment
Peace…..Be Still…...'s avatar

Sadly I did see footage of her collapsed on the floor in front of the seat…so much blood. It took a moment, a clean cut I suppose and then?..I agree with you though, in these times it’s hard to trust anything.

Expand full comment
Jane Baker's avatar

Thank you for your reply. I saw a different video to whatever some other people saw,which is strange in itself. I now wonder even if Gaza is a real place,if I'm just being fed disturbing tales,after all I can no more verify it for myself than a villager in a medieval village hearing tales of Prestor John

Expand full comment
Peace…..Be Still…...'s avatar

It’s exhausting, isn’t it? So much gaslighting so many lies so much corruption ….we have to find our way through all this mess…

Expand full comment
Jeanne McSherry's avatar

Every single word is true Del and Ole Dammegard is one of the most outstanding truth seekers and truth tellers in the world today. Thank you

Expand full comment
Mtxjeqn's avatar

"What it implies, essentially, is that not only have they been hoodwinked by a psyop but they have been hoodwinked by a psyop so blatant and shameless that only an idiot could have been taken in by it."

You get to a point where you feel like you're in the movie They Live - it's all so obvious once you've joined the dots, and people are in a semi-hypnotic state and completely unaware of it

Ps I can highly recommend Earth's Earliest Ages by GH Pember. Very scholarly book both for theology and real science, lots references to Psalms too. A classic for advanced truth seekers

I'll only read originals of 19th C books (from the British Library) - they're often heavily edited after c. 1920s. St Paul in Britain by RW Morgan (1861) is 100 pages shorter in post 1920s versions

Expand full comment
James Delingpole's avatar

Ooh. Please do give us some other recommendations. I'm with you on the Pember. It's a classic.

Expand full comment
Mtxjeqn's avatar

Tbh I haven't read an awful lot from the period but have been v impressed with the erudition of some of these CofE country vicars like Pember. I was kind of researching the roots of the 'anti-St Paul' ideology which seems to have sprung up around then, expressed in Blavatsky and Tolstoy. It's essentially occult and freemasonic in origin

St Paul in Britain by Rev Morgan is more about the foundation of the Christian Church in Britain by St Joseph of Arimathea very shortly after the crucifixion. It's not as outlandish as it sounds - 'And did those feet, in ancient times ...' etc. The facts support the thesis. St Paul barely makes an appearance but you do get a better understanding of the Druids - spoiler alert - they're not the baby sacrificing pagans we've been led to believe but were in fact astrological genius's and were very receptive to the Way; they'd observed the star 38 years earlier and it all fit (they were also Trintarians) and welcomed St Joseph and then converted making Britain the first country to adopt Christianity. (they did exactly what the Hebrews failed to do)

It may also explain why there's a giant rock festival at Glastonbury every year ...

You can google a pdf of the original and it should be about 230 pages no less. They literally just removed the whole of the first chapter of the original in later editions then slashed huge bits throughout. That in itself is a wake up call to anyone still on the fence about the state of the west now, and the Truth of Christianity 

Expand full comment
Mtxjeqn's avatar

Just to add, the purpose of the book is to prove apostolic succession for Anglicanism which he fails to do - he seems to have no idea about Orthodoxy or the filioque heresy and the 1054 schism. But that's a minor quibble, the history he sets out is very thought-provoking and compelling

Expand full comment
Ellis Taylor's avatar

Do you have a link for the 230 page pdf please? I've looked and found books but not pdfs.

Expand full comment
Mtxjeqn's avatar

This is actually 253 pages (consider - the one on amazon now - 128 pages!)

http://library.pyramidal-foundational-information.com/books//St_Paul_in_Britain_or_The_origin_of_Brit.pdf

Expand full comment
Ellis Taylor's avatar

Thank you. Very much.

Expand full comment
Mtxjeqn's avatar

P.65:

"This was the Druidic trinity, the three aspects of which were known as Beli, Taran, Esu or Yesu. When Christianity preached Jesus as God, it preached the most familiar name of its own deity to Druidism; and in the ancient British tongue 'Jesus' has never assumed its Greek, Latin, or Hebrew form, but remains the pure Druidic ' Yesu.' It is singular thus that the ancient Briton has never changed the name of the God he and his forefathers worshipped, nor has ever worshipped but one God"

The land given to St Joseph and his group (which may have included the Mother of God herself, the Virgin Mary) at Avalon (Glastonbury) by the king is recorded in the domesday book. The Holy Grail (two vials containing Christ's blood and sweat, and the chalice from the last supper) is buried there as is his relics

Expand full comment
Lucas Nascario's avatar

Truman Show is an excellent film that covers this. As well as (obviously) the Matrix.

Expand full comment
BigBuckle's avatar

They got away with faking the assassination of a US president in 1963. So faking Kirk's death is a walk in the park.

Expand full comment
Joanie Higgs's avatar

Surely you mean "faking who killed the US president in 1963". JFK was absolutely assassinated.

Expand full comment
Joanie Higgs's avatar

An Amazon Prime Video documentary, eh?

One thing my graduate degree was good for in learning to be discerning of my sources.

At any rate, how would it have served JFK's enemies to only 'fake' his death? Of what use would he have been to them to have lived. Really, what a ridiculous assertion.

Also in future you might like to know that you can delete everything after the question mark in any link.

Expand full comment
BigBuckle's avatar

Watch the film before jumping to comment.

It addresses the issues you raise.

By your logic all the Hollywood films that reveal some element of truth - The Truman Show, The Matrix, Wag the Dog, Contagion etc etc must be completely disregarded because they are Hollywood films?

It's been long established that 'they' like to have the truth hidden in plain sight. 'They' seem to get a thrill out of making revelations.

Expand full comment
Joanie Higgs's avatar

Well, true enough. Still, I'm not compelled to pay to see this film.

Expand full comment
Travel To Understand's avatar

Not everything is a conspiracy.

Expand full comment
BigBuckle's avatar

Not every day is wet.

Expand full comment
Jane Baker's avatar

Elvis Lives! Never thought I'd say that. He's knocking on a bit now but still a looker. Imagine having to fake your own death to escape Living in Hell while still alive.

Expand full comment
Lucas Nascario's avatar

Yeah I would agree They Live is probably the best because it actually shows how people are unaware. Truman Show and Matrix have a lot of truth to them too, but They Live focused specifically on the zombification aspect of the countless people who are fast asleep.

Expand full comment
Mtxjeqn's avatar

The Matrix is based on a depiction of the 'elites' view of reality, it's their worldview

Expand full comment
Jacqueline's avatar

Don’t forget…CK and George floyd shared a birthday. One more coinkydink

Expand full comment
CowdnOwd's avatar

Only a 365 to 1 outside bet. I've won worse bets on the gee-gees.

Expand full comment
mrsrosiek's avatar

Surely the "Charles Kirkland" and "Tyler" connection should be enough to convince people to at least question it?!

Expand full comment
James Delingpole's avatar

You'd think...

Expand full comment
Deenzy's avatar

The Charlie Kirk event is literally retarded. On a positive note, It has smoked out all the CO who hadn’t already shown their hands

Expand full comment
Lincoln's avatar

My thoughts exactly! 👊🏼

Expand full comment
Lucas Nascario's avatar

I have a sister who still believes it. I am finding her to be "retarded" - she would seem to think (like most people) that watching news is being informed, educated and doing research. Needless to say, she never reads anything, and doesn't even have the attention span to do so. I sent her this article and she just read the premise and got pissed then immediately said she was off to bed. There might not be hope for her at least anytime soon as she's "worldy."

The news is literally just 24hr witchcraft 365 days a year.

Expand full comment
mrsrosiek's avatar

Do you think? I don't know. I think there are people who are not CO who don't believe it for their own reasons.

Expand full comment
kathy dimov's avatar

Great stack and yep I’m with you 💯 on all the points you brought up. It’s plain as day to anyone with discernment. The great delusions are gonna start rolling out and many will be deceived which is really a shame.

Like I always say you just can’t make this stuff up. They truly are mocking us.

Expand full comment
Jane Baker's avatar

The nice people fall for it hard,because theyre nice and the other nice people want to be with and identify with the nice people. Covid showed us that. It showed THEM that.

Expand full comment
Paul Seamons's avatar

Miri AF called this out immediately after it happened. I have seen many slow motion clips of the shot and it does not appear to be a genuine hit. The 30-06 cartridge used I am informed would have done far worse damage than it appeared to do. I have seen those cartridges fired into melons and it basically vaporised them.

I agree that it is highly unlikely that it was a genuine assassination (it has too many irregularities, similar to the Trump 'attempted assassination')

Expand full comment
David Weiss's avatar

James, thank god you see through this BS. Most truthers have fallen for one of the many red herring nonsense shooter stories. Nobody was shot and no shots were fired. Did you see my "Charlie Kirk in 6 Minutes" video? Also I did an interview with Christopher Key and another with Pr. James Fetzer destroy this psyop. You can find all these videos and many more on StopLookThink.com Scroll down to the Charlie Kirk page.

Expand full comment
Rob D's avatar

I have hunted with a 30.06 in my younger years... if you shoot a rabbit with a 30.06 round it literally pretty much explodes the rabbit. And a tranny/furry loving guy that weighs 90 pounds soaking wet running across a roof with a traditional 30.06 with a wood stock and jumping to the ground, etc. I mean... come on. Impossible scenario. Everything is a lie.

Expand full comment
Jack Winogrodzki's avatar

"All the world's a stage, and all the men and women merely players; They have their exits and their entrances, And one man in his time plays many parts, His acts being seven ages."

Expand full comment
Annie's avatar

I have quoted this many times in the last 5 years going down the rabbit hole after 74 years of propaganda in my life.

Expand full comment
Jack Winogrodzki's avatar

It’s funny how once you see it you can’t unsee it. It’s everywhere!

Expand full comment
Annie's avatar

So true.

Expand full comment
Jane Baker's avatar

It's all a play and Putin has got the juicy part of stage villain,and as we know the villain is often the sexiest character. I've read he's dead nervous and scared to go to Hungary to visit Orban as the countries around Hungary are all EU/NATO and he might get arrested under that international arrest order,the same one that's out on Bibi FakeName and he ain't in the slammer,but this scaredy Putin is the same man who a few months ago confidently stepped off a plane in Alaska (USA) and totally BOSSED IT.

Expand full comment
MoT's avatar

If Trump had any balls, or got his back off of the mantel from Adelson, he could just as easily have flown to Moscow. That he hasn't tells me he's a controlled coward. Mr. "I'll stop the war in 24 hours" is a loud mouthed fool and plays his part very well.

Expand full comment
Jack Winogrodzki's avatar

They’re all actors!

Expand full comment
Lincoln's avatar

Something always felt off to me when it came to CK. Although on paper I should have liked him very much. His exit stage right, and CO’s reaction to it, finally made it clear to me that CO is in fact co. And, it seems that Fuentes is now being foisted upon the masses (dip toe in the MSM water via a CO interview) as a more extreme version of the CK character. Is it the 30s all over again? Feels like something big is at play.

Expand full comment
sarah's avatar

Yes, a convergence of psyops.

Expand full comment
Middyboy's avatar

With all these incidents there is the initial visceral shock (which is a key part of the psychological operation) of seeing a human being killed right there on our screen. This makes you push back on those questioning the narrative. But after that, the truly bizarre charade, the lack of crime scene investigation or autopsy, the utter weirdness of the 'event' attended by his wife... It was all bonkers, but to what purpose? They've outdone themselves this time. I don't believe anything they say anymore.

Expand full comment
Rhonda's avatar

I think that was perhaps part of the point? To show the world— and especially those still sound asleep— that it’s all a giant psyop. To get us all to consider that maybe we’re being played. To get the sleepers to start to flesh out the concept of Problem Reaction Solution. To get us to consider that we’re being manipulated—all of us— for a darker agenda.

And it needed to be obviously fake because the U.S doesn’t seem to pick up on subtlety 🙄

Expand full comment
Rhonda's avatar

I would also add that the eternal distraction (which often includes outright trauma), away from what’s really going on in the background, is always necessary for the powers that want to be.

And of course, the need for us to be divided

Expand full comment
Grant Simmons ( Australia)'s avatar

I don't know , if you're wrong , but I also don't know whether you're right ....frankly , I'm not surprised by anything any more ....I guess that makes me a conspiracy theorist too .....!🤷🏻‍♂️

Expand full comment
DJL's avatar

Feel free to steal my motto: trust no one, question everything

Expand full comment
Paul Youngs's avatar

'Question everything, trust few, paddle your own canoe' as a fellow awaken soul once told me 😁

Since my awakening in 2020, I now take the stance that everything is fake until proven otherwise. Seems to work better in this theatrical world than the other way round.

Expand full comment
Anna's avatar

Or, my motto, never believe anything you hear and only half of what you see.

Expand full comment
Jane Baker's avatar

Aw,trust a bit. Question indeed. But don't go so far you become WHAT THEY WANT.

Expand full comment
Peter Yim's avatar

The Charlie Kirk "assassination" has been a remarkable development - and as alluded to in this article - the psychology of the state media fundamentalists - who take all proclamations from state media at precisely face value - is perhaps the most puzzling aspect.

Expand full comment